Models · Announcements

Introducing Comet

2 August 2026

Comet is our speed model. It runs on every commit, catching slop, behavioural regressions, and the obvious security holes before they ever reach a branch.

The cheapest time to fix generated slop is the moment it is written. A placeholder section that survives one commit tends to survive the next twenty, and by the time anyone reads the diff properly it has load-bearing code built on top of it.

Comet exists to close that window. At 120 ms and 320 tokens per decision it is the fastest and cheapest model in the comparison below — fast enough to sit in a pre-commit hook or run inline in the editor — while still landing at 96.8% accuracy, ahead of every external model we test.

ModelToken UsageTime TakenAccuracy
Nebula1,350 tokens780 ms93.6%
Comet320 tokens120 ms96.8%
Fable 51,420 tokens820 ms92.8%
Opus 53,600 tokens1,650 ms89.5%
GPT 5.6 Sol2,100 tokens1,240 ms84.2%
Gemini CLI2,850 tokens2,100 ms78.6%
Gemini 3.6 Flash890 tokens450 ms72.1%
Comet and Nebula against the external models we test, across token usage, time taken, and accuracy.

Performance and cost

Comet is not a smaller version of Nebula running the same passes badly. It scores the surface that actually changed, against the last known-good state of the flows that surface belongs to, which is why it can return inside a normal editor round trip.

The cost of that scope is cross-file reasoning. Comet will not find a vulnerability that only exists because two routes trust each other, and it does not guess at them — anything that needs a full trace is escalated to Nebula rather than answered cheaply.

Time Taken

Nebula
780 ms
Comet
120 ms
Fable 5
820 ms
Opus 5
1,650 ms
GPT 5.6 Sol
1,240 ms
Gemini CLI
2,100 ms
Gemini 3.6 Flash
450 ms
Time taken per decision. Comet is the fastest model in the comparison by a wide margin.

Working with Comet

A Comet pass runs the same three stages as Nebula, scoped to the changed surface rather than the whole project.

Comet returning decisions inline as generated code is written.

Review and safety

Comet only ever proposes. Nothing it produces reaches your codebase until you approve it, and every decision arrives with the reasoning that produced it.

Where Comet is not confident, it says so and escalates rather than answering anyway. A fast model that guesses is worse than no model at all.

Token Usage

Nebula
1,350 tokens
Comet
320 tokens
Fable 5
1,420 tokens
Opus 5
3,600 tokens
GPT 5.6 Sol
2,100 tokens
Gemini CLI
2,850 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash
890 tokens
Token usage per decision. Comet is the cheapest model in the comparison, at roughly a ninth of Opus 5.

Getting started

Comet is available in the CLI as a pre-commit hook or watch process, inline in Cursor and VS Code, and as the default check on every push through GitHub, Vercel, and Netlify. It is billed at $0.01 per commit and $0.15 for a full project sweep.

For release branches, security review, or the first pass over a project Behavr has never seen, send it to Nebula instead.

Get started with Behavr

Footnotes

  1. 1.Accuracy is measured as the share of proposed decisions accepted without modification across our internal evaluation set of generated projects.
  2. 2.Time taken and token usage are medians per decision, including the reasoning returned alongside it.

Related content